20 classics #12: Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen

I’m reading 20 classic, modern-classic or cult books. Read more about this project here. See the other classics here.

Why did I want to read it?

I’d only read Emma and Pride and Prejudice of Austen’s novels, and when I heard that Northanger Abbey was a sort of satire of the gothic novel, I was intrigued. I also visited Bath last year, where much of the novel is set.

When was it published?

Northanger Abbey was first published in 1818, posthumously, though it was one of the first novels Austen completed. My edition is the 2003 Penguin Classic with an informative introduction by Marilyn Butler. There are many editions available.

What’s it about?

‘Our heroine’ (referred to as such by the author within the novel) is Catherine Morland. She is young, impressionable, and experiencing Bath, and fashionable society, for the first time. There’s a sort of rivalry for her friendship and love between two new sets of acquaintances, the Thorpes and the Tilneys. The novel is also a very early example of metafiction, where the author is present and the characters have conversations about reading, the worth of a novel, fiction versus nonfiction/history, women writers, and more. The plot and events are also (seemingly fondly) parodic of both Gothic novels and ‘novels of sensibility’.

Tell us more about the author.

Jane Austen was born at Steventon on 16 December 1775. Her family moved to Bath when her father retired in 1801. When he died in 1805, she moved around with her mother. I learnt, when I visited the Jane Austen Centre in Bath, that after her father died her family had quite a difficult time, financially. She certainly got to see Bath and its ‘fashionable society’ from different points of view, and she was more productive living quietly at the family home before and after Bath (at Chawton). She received a marriage proposal while there, and accepted (one can assume, thinking of her family) but the next day withdrew her acceptance. She wrote to her niece, Fanny White: ‘Anything is to be preferred or endured rather than marrying without Affection’. It is believed much of Austen’s genuine feelings on this subject are due to the true-love relationship of her parents. There is so much more to say about her, but I’ll keep this brief (see this blog for all the info you could ever need on Jane Austen). She is undeniably one of the warmest, cleverest writers who ever lived, and was modest about her own genius. She died at the age of 41 on 18 July 1817.

So, what did I think? Does it deserve to be a classic?

Northanger Abbey is generally considered to be Austen’s most ‘light-hearted’ novel, and the characters certainly don’t stick in your mind as much as, say, Elizabeth Bennet and Mr Darcy. However, Catherine Morley’s innocence (and almost transparence) is a deliberate method on the part of the author—Catherine is both a parodic character and a vehicle for the reader. The reader is also stumbling, wide-eyed, into this strange and undeniably shallow world (Mrs Allen, with whom Catherine stays, is obsessed with clothing, fashions and second-hand remarks). But the reader is also allowed distance by the intrusive, authorial voice. In one of my favourite parts, Catherine allows herself to be whipped into a kind of grotesque fancy by Henry Tilney’s comparisons of Northanger Abey to the settings of Gothic novels. She then spends a sleepless night wondering what could possibly be in the locked drawer of the cabinet! The reader (permitted ironic distance) knows it will be something ordinary, but we still can’t help but wonder.

Though it may be more ‘light-hearted’ than other novels by Austen, Northanger Abbey’s intellectual engagements and layers of meaning (and humour) are hugely impressive. I’ve read modern metafictional novels like John Fowles’ The French Lieutenant’s Woman and Italo Calvino’s If On A Winters Night a Traveller and I didn’t realise Austen had beat them by about 150 years, winking to her readers. She even acknowledges (and rallies with) her fellow writers of novels, encouraging them to create heroines who read novels (the layers!):

Alas! if the heroine of one novel be not patronised by the heroine of another, from whom can she expect protection and regard? I cannot approve of it. Let us leave it to the Reviewers to abuse such effusions of fancy at their leisure [turn over a novel’s insipid pages with disgust], and over every new novel to talk in threadbare strains of the trash with which the press now groans. Let us not desert one another; we are an injured body.

Catherine and Henry Tilney have a sparring relationship throughout the book. They debate the merits of fiction versus nonfiction/history, and have an exchange about women’s writing which cleverly inverts an idea and reveals Austen’s feelings on equality (we know she contradicts this in some ways, in her work, but I see her as being both within and ahead of her time). The exchange is as follows:

Catherine tells Tilney that she does not keep a journal and he thinks she must be lying. He says (among other things): ‘How are your various dresses to be remembered, and the particular state of your complexion, and curl of your hair to be described in all their diversities, without having constant recourse to a journal?—My dear madam, I am not so ignorant of young ladies’ ways as you wish to believe me; it is this delightful habit of journalising which largely contributes to form the easy style of writing for which ladies are so generally celebrated. Every body allows that the talent of writing agreeable letters is peculiarly female…’ He goes on a little. Catherine baulks. She says: ‘I have sometimes thought… whether ladies do write so much better letters than gentlemen! That is—I should not think the superiority was always on our side’. Very wry. The superiority is no doubt not always on the side of one sex or another in other matters, too.

But it is still this bullying fellow that Catherine begins to fall for. Maybe it shows that her character isn’t really so impressionable, that she enjoys a little intellectual sparring (and will grow to enjoy it more—the reader, as the reader of novels, often would side with her in these debates). Maybe she is more imaginative than impressionable, though the extent of what she imagines possible does result in her putting her foot in her mouth at one point…

Northanger Abbey’s cleverness impressed and delighted me at times, but the overall story is a little disjointed, and I was a bit underwhelmed at the end. I think the romantic hero is much less memorable than, say, Mr Darcy (*cough*). But there aren’t many endings that satisfy (on a specific level) as that of Pride and Prejudice. That said, it’s actually not one of my favourite books. That was another reason for trying Austen again. Emma is the best of hers I’ve read, and though everything about Austen and her work can be appreciated—she was undeniably ahead of her time, intelligent, genuine, clever—on some level my personal tastes swing more towards the (admittedly, often flowery) dramatic and romantic Gothics…

What’s next?

Perhaps, on that note, I should read a Bronte next, or Hardy’s Tess of the D’ubervilles? I’m also slowly making my way through Hemingway’s To Whom the Bell Tolls.

16 thoughts on “20 classics #12: Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen

    • He goes over the same things–Maria, the bridge–it’s interesting but I’m definitely finding it a slow read.

  1. Excellent review of Northanger. I have a real soft spot for Northanger as I felt Catherine was such a likeable and sweet heroine who developed more backbone as the story progressed. I actually loved Henry though, I loved his playfulness in contrast to to the more reserved Austen heroes. It’s definitely disjointed compared to the sophistication of Emma or Persuasion though I think this was the first full length novel she completed for publication, so it lacks some maturity.

    Definitely go for Tess next, though it’s utterly devastating (but beautiful)!

    • Thanks Lisa, it’s great to have your thoughts. I can see what you mean about Henry, he is a very lively character.

  2. Did it feel like a ‘spoof’ of gothic novels in general though?

    Whilst I didn’t love Henry, I really liked him. He’s one of those ‘nice man’. But Catherine… oh, dear, I laugh at her!

    • I don’t think it felt like a spoof (spoof sounds more mocking than parody). And there are other elements to it as well, the ‘Gothic’ elements are more in the second half.

  3. Ahhh, I love Northanger Abbey, although my absolute favourite is Sense and Sensibility, which I read for the first time last year when my friends and I hosted our own Jane Austen Book Club, complete with tea.

    Looking forward to seeing what you read next! I am partial to the Brontes.

      • I like Pride and Prejudice the best of what I’ve read. Sense and Sensibility bored me and I hated Persuasion. I am not really enough of a girly girly to love Austen I don’t think. Perhaps I should give Emma a go though, or this? If Tess is to be next it might give me that push into reading it, my copy is one of those lovely Penguin Classics with the patterned covers. I was seduced into buying it but am yet to read it.

  4. Sense and Sensibility is a superb study of sisters, romantic restraint and romantic excess. Elinor is a wonderful heroine. All the characters make up a plot that is so captivating. Especially once they get to London. And who could hate Persuasion? It’s thrilling! So tense! So pained! So succint! The whole set up of Anne being in Captain Wentworth’s company so many years after their failed romance and to be with her as she navigates through her emotions and her regrets while she feels she is losing her chance with Wentworth yet again? My heart hurts just thinking about it. And those wonderful supporting characters – Mary the sappy hypochondriac and that awfully pretentious father and the gorgeous Admiral. Read Tess of the D’urbervilles. Devastating. Or any Hardy. I had a winter where I read all of them one after the other. Made my life seem like disneyland. I’m currently reading Anne Bronte’s “Tenant of Wildfell Hall” and am struck by some of the (what I thought were) modern narrative ploys and self relexive text. Who would have thunk it?

    • Thanks for your thoughtful and detailed comment, Julianne, shining a light on some of the Austen novels I haven’t yet read. Yep, Hardy and the Brontes will come soon. I’m interested to hear that Tenant of Wildfell Hall also has self-reflexive aspects!

  5. And Angela, after you’ve read S and S, watch the film with Alan Rickman in it. It’s great.

    It’s interesting that Katie says that she’s not enough of a girly girl to enjoy Jane Austen. I’ve never even thought of it that way. I wonder if other people would agree? Do you have to be a girly girl to enjoy Austen?

    • I enjoyed this review of NA very much; I think you’ve hit on its strong and weak points very well. And I definitely do not think you have to be a girly girl to enjoy Austen. Just think about some of her biggest fans from earlier times: Sir Walter Scott of Ivanhoe fame, Benjamin Disraeli, prime minister in the mid 19th-century (who, once asked, if he had time to read novels, said, “All six of them, every year.”) Rudyard Kipling! Winston Churchill!

  6. I don’t know what of the Bronte sisters you’ve read, but I love ‘Wuthering Heights’ and ‘Jane Eyre’. Maybe if you want to go for a brilliant-but-not-as-well-known as the others you should try ‘The Tenant of Wildfell Hall’ by Anne Bronte?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s