The poetic & the profane: an interview with Miles Vertigan, on Life Kills

Sleepers Publishing
9781742701851
October 2011 (paperback

This interview was first published in Bookseller+Publisher magazine.

Life Kills is a slim novel but I imagine many hours went into its construction. Can you talk a bit about how it came together?

For a number of years I’d been writing rants; stories told in single, unpunctuated paragraphs that sit somewhere between poetry and prose, play around with words and rhythm and can create very vivid imagery in the mind of the reader. I felt this form had great potential for a longer work and so embarked on writing Life Kills. Early on, all of the characters kindly emerged from out of the ether and it just kind of took off from there. And you’re right, it did take a long time to write, but it was a lot of fun to do and I’m really happy with how it turned out.

The language is an incredibly inventive mix, what did you draw from? Advertisements (and TV in general), eavesdropping on conversations, hanging out at the shops, reading poetry?

It’s hard to know where it all comes from, but the language of advertising was definitely a big part of it. It’s this ubiquitous background hum that forms the sonic and literary wallpaper of our lives, but we’re talking wallpaper with superpowers. It’s everpresent, inescapable and often seems to just seep in without us really noticing. Ads use language in a way that can coerce, demean and treat people like idiots along with their equal ability to entertain, move us and of course, shift units. I wanted to use some of that extraordinary pool of contradiction that swirls around us every day to tell a story. I also love banter and classic double headers from Pete and Dud to Howard Moon and Vince Noir, so I guess all those hours of bantering and listening to the masters of banter helped me with the crazy conversations that make up much of the story. TV and reality TV in particular are also there in the mix and I think poetry is too. I love poetry, as long as it’s by Brautigan or Bukowski—so those guys may well have helped in some way. And yes, I eavesdrop. A lot.

In my review [Bookseller+Publisher July 2011] I say it reminded me a bit of A Clockwork Orange, have you read it? Are there other texts that inspired the work?

A Clockwork Orange is my favourite movie and I did try to read the book once, but let it slide because it was somehow messing with my memory of the film. Appalling, but true. There isn’t a single text that inspired Life Kills, but I am a huge fan of Mark Leyner’s work from the time before he tragically disappeared into the void of Hollywood screenwriting-world, in particular Et Tu, Babe and My Cousin, My Gastroenterologist. So Leyner’s been an inspiration, but he has to share that with William Burroughs, Richard Brautigan, Hunter S Thompson, Wake in Fright, Charles Bukowski, Johnny Rotten, Quentin Crisp, Banksy, Morrissey, Andy Warhol, Miles Davis, Dylan Thomas, Woody Allen, The Chelsea Hotel, Henry Rollins, my uncle, Dylan Moran, Northcote Plaza, Brett Easton Ellis, Bill Evans, Team America, Barry Humphries, small aircraft, big aircraft, Melrose Place, Damien Hirst, Texan vodka, the Kimberley, Dorothy Parker, San Francisco, appalling infomercials, the opening sequence of Manhattan etc etc etc. It’s a crowded room, that one.

Who do you see as being the main character of the story? We start with the terrorist, but for me Chad the co-pilot was this kind of tragic, sad character who seemed to speak some reason here and there (in a skewed way). Or is there none? May it’s even be the reader/observer?

I see the terrorist as the main character of the book, but also feel other characters are just as important. But that’s just my opinion! One of the great things about fiction is that readers raise, ponder and answer or attempt to answer all kinds of questions for themselves that come up in the unique version of any story they create by reading it and I wouldn’t want to interfere with that process too much—or at all, in fact.

Do you see yourself as an experimental or avant-garde writer? What does that mean to you?

I think if you call yourself an experimental or avant-garde writer you run the very real risk of either instantly clearing the room or facing some kind of festival of eye-rolling, so I’m not going to! It’s actually a great shame, because experimental writing as I see it—finding new ways to tell stories—is a wonderful thing that has the capacity to progress language and writing and I wish it had a more prominent place in the literary landscape. I hope this situation changes, either by stealth (call it what you like, just don’t call it experimental writing!) or, and this would be so much better, through the courage and commitment of publishers putting this kind of work out there.

This Too Shall Pass by SJ Finn

This review first appeared in the Sydney Morning Herald: Spectrum on the weekend of February 26-27.

Sleepers Publishing
9781742700380
March 2011
(Aus)

Jen Montgomery, known as ‘Monty’, had always considered herself a ‘forever’ person, until years into her marriage when something shifted. Monty began a relationship with another woman. This Too Shall Pass not only reflects on the complicated matter of a relationship break-up (with a child involved) but other shifts in life: at work, with where we live, and within the self.

Monty is a social worker, working with children and adolescents. Her cases, her colleagues and workplace politics take up much space in the novel. At first this seemed to detract from Monty’s story of her relationship break-up, but soon you realise the novel is the story of life in the everyday sense, with all its struggles, changes, moments of push and pull. Involvement in her work also has an effect on Monty’s relationship and the time spent with her son.

The story is told as one person sitting down to recount the recent shifts in her life, someone who must, through the course of writing the piece, become okay with instability. She says, ‘… before I vanish altogether – I’m going to attempt to take stock.’ It’s a motivation both honest and desperate, and it hangs over the clean, almost detached prose of the novel.

This is no escapist ‘find-yourself’ narrative in the realm of Elizabeth Gilbert or Mary Moody. It does not spur the reader on. It is not sentimental. But many modern readers would find much to relate to: the terrible stab of new desire; having to lie in the bed you’ve made; feeling green and over-eager in a new city and a new workplace; and having to deal with the differing, sometimes ludicrous, opinions of new workmates. Most affecting are the moments when Monty misses her son, and the rendering of the way things change between her and her former husband. The loss of love. The subtle way he changes in her mind, the way she feels about his having control over the situation, because she is the one who left.

This theme of control comes into the workplace as well, and is part of a larger social commentary present in the novel. The institution where she works, Marlowe Downs, is controversial in the community, is subject to audits and is slowly moving more into the realm of corporate control. Monty has a never-ending stream of paperwork to get on top of, besides the time she needs to spend with a large number of patients. To add to this, she has to deal with the prejudice of another staff member toward her homosexuality.

It takes a few pages to get used to the voice of the novel, Finn’s first, but once you get used to it it’s like being on the listening side of a long conversation. Like a conversation, too, when the person walks away at the end you wonder whether they’ll feel any better soon, or if they’ll ever get to see their son more, and you know deep down that the answer is probably no. This is realism as almost cold reality (not to say that it isn’t touching) and possibly reactive to all that self-help, motivational jargon out there. A clue to this is the way Monty tries to avoid clear-cut diagnoses for her young patients, fighting against psychiatrists who will categorise and treat, without paying attention to all contributing factors.

This Too Shall Pass acknowledges, in a way like Helen Garner’s The Spare Room, the difficult and the confusing and life’s unresolvable, constant and intricate instabilities. It’s best to ride with it.

Guest review: Alice Robinson on John Tesarsch’s The Philanthropist

philanthropist150Sleepers Publishing
November 2010, 9781740669979 (Aus)

reviewed by Alice Robinson

John Tesarsch’s accomplished first novel The Philanthropist is a book about parents and children. It is about what we pass on, and what we inherit in turn. ‘The best thing a father can do, of course, is be there for his children. I wasn’t, because I was following false gods’ declares Charles Bradshaw, protagonist. He is speaking uninvited at the wedding of his mortified daughter, in the penultimate scenes of both the novel and his life. Here, Charles addresses the book’s underpinning theme, for The Philanthropist is also about money – the most imposing and controlling of the false gods Charles refers to.  Money inherited and endowed, the novel tells us, corrupts, controls, defiles, destroys – for generations. What Charles receives from his father he gives in turn to his son, with ever more cancerous consequences; each generation in the Bradshaw family more reliant on – and more deformed by – what their money can buy. We are exposed to other examples of this genealogical decay, for almost all of Tesarsch’s finely drawn characters bare the scars of their parental relationships – or lack thereof. Perhaps this is the way of the world, as Philip Larkin would surely agree.  In any case, The Philanthropist presents a deep and quietly sad exploration of the inevitably disastrous ways in which one’s parents might, without meaning to, ‘fuck you up’. It is a compelling read.

The Philanthropist is the most recent novel to come out of Sleepers, an independent publisher based in Melbourne. With Stephen Amsterdam’s widely acclaimed Things We Didn’t See Coming, and Kalinda Ashton’s The Danger Game to their credit, Sleepers must be doing something right. Whether publishing first novels – particularly those set in Australia – accords wholly with the publisher’s mission-statement or not, it remains that they are doing just that, with great success. Each of the aforementioned novels differs in regards to style and subject matter, but each shares one important element – beyond critical commendation – for each, arguably, presents a vision of contemporary life.  While the novels of Ashton and Tesarsch unfold in the world as we know it, and are definitively and enjoyably Australian in setting, Amsterdam’s vision, partly post-apocalyptic, is set in an unnamed location.

Some might balk at my positioning of Things We Didn’t See Coming, alongside the other particularly Australian Sleepers texts. Yet to me, Amsterdam’s book is as locatable, literally, in relation to the Australian landscape as Tesarsch’s – locatable also classifiably, within a canon of apocalyptic writing about Australian lands – along with, for example, the novels of George Turner and Gabrielle Lord. In any case, regardless of setting, there is an even more crucial element that underpins the three works. For the narratives of Amsterdam, Ashton and Tesarsch play out against a common thematic backdrop – each one explicitly exploring a contemporary issue, one that manifests within and around the lives of the characters it brings to life. These issues, while various – environmental and societal decay, worker’s rights, isolation and drug use, and in the poignant case of The Philanthropist, the interlaced roles of money, family, and guilt – are what makes these novels great, even important. And to say that the issues are ‘explicit’ is not to say that these narratives are didactic, preachy or overly burdened with ‘a message’. Quite the opposite. Tesarsch’s rendering of his underpinning concerns within the story of the Bradshaw family, has been done delicately, even insidiously, so that the reader is conscious only of the narrative and character development while reading; wholly absorbed in the story itself. It is only afterwards, when the book is complete, that the clarity of the message – a bitter aftertaste – remains.

Each of these special first books is contributing to the ongoing discussion about what it means to live at this time – in Australia, and in the world at large. When, in The Philanthropist, we are taken to Charles’ beachfront mansion (all glass and contemporary art) we recognise ourselves, just as we recognise ourselves on his daughter’s self-sustaining ‘hippie’ property near Hepburn Springs. This is not to say that by recognising, we like what we see. Certainly the novels that Sleepers are publishing – no less Tesarsch’s than the others – present a pretty grim picture of life, particularly life in contemporary Australia. Yet it is heartening to find that so many first-time authors are writing about their own contexts – or, that Sleepers are seeking to publish the narratives of those that do, as it may be.

In an era bloodied by genre writing, where vampires appear to reign, it is also refreshing to see that literary works do remain viable, publishable and read. Like the novels of both Ashton and Amsterdam, The Philanthropist is multifaceted without being convoluted, its structure elegantly poetic, the language precise. It is a fine example of contemporary literary fiction. As the narrative weaves through and across time we come to understand why Tesarsch’s characters have developed in the way that they have – but slowly. We first meet Charles after he is awarded an Order of Australia for his charitable works, but in spite of this accolade, we know at the very beginning of the book that something isn’t right. What is wrong is the historic tragedy that sits like a stain at the centre of the story. Tesarsch’s narrative structure serves to bring the reader into consciousness of the tragedy with patience, cranking the tension all the while. If anything, the novel is almost too neat, too controlled in its exposition – like a trinket over-buffed, a little of what might have once produced its shine has now been rubbed away. Yet this is a minor gripe, and one happily made. For better a work be endowed with too much care, than nowhere near enough.

In contrast to the poetry in the structure, Tesarsch’s prose itself is crisp, almost terse – each sentence a hard, clean nugget of polished stone. That is, the writing is beautiful and eloquent and vivid, but not in the lyrical, language-drenched manner of some authors (Anne Michaels springs to mind) for whom metaphor and imagery are the stalwarts of their craft. Instead, Tesarsch builds description and exposes his characters with disarming straightforwardness, his style deceptively restrained.  This restraint lends Tesarsch’s writing an enviable clarity. In fact, in light of The Philanthropist’s discontinuous structure: the various points-of-view and multi-generational plot line, the seeming straightforwardness of the author’s prose style serves only to enrich the narrative. There exists in Tesarsch’s writing the assuredness and poise of a far more experienced writer. Beyond this, his first novel, one can imagine many more neat, but quietly flooring stories, waiting to be penned.

A philanthropist can be defined as a person who practices charitable or benevolent actions, or one who loves humanity generally. It is a fitting title for Tesarsch’s novel, which ultimately examines the tensions between good deeds and bad, and the role that money plays in aiding and even defining both. The Philanthropist questions whether one who worships false gods, as Charles does, can truly love humanity. Or whether, despite all best efforts for charity, inheriting large amounts of money ultimately costs the humanity of oneself. It is a fitting message for contemporary Australia in an age of abundant wealth, and greed. It is what makes The Philanthropist not only an excellent first novel, but also a valuable addition to cultural development in Australia. By being shown ourselves in print, we learn something not only of who we are as human beings, but as a collective people. When Tesarsch writes about how the deeds of the past can haunt us, how money can corrupt, how guilt erodes and the way in which justice bought with cash is no real justice at all – there is a collective shiver in response. A kind of truth is painted by Tesarsch in The Philanthropist. It isn’t a beautiful picture, but remarkably, it looks just like us.

Alice Robinson writes fiction. She works as a freelance writer, professional book group and writing group facilitator, and she teaches in universities. Since 2008, Alice has been researching climate change and Australian literature at Victoria University, where she is a PhD candidate. Having been published in various journals, she also blogs on books and reading at www.critrature.blogspot.com.

‘What is a short story?’ Jon Bauer’s Sleepers Almanac and app launch speech

Last night, author Jon Bauer (Rocks in the Belly, Scribe) launched the sixth Sleepers Almanac and the new Sleepers literary app at the Bella Union Bar, Trades Hall, Melbourne. I thought his speech was wonderful, so with Jon’s kind permission, here it is for you all to read:

Have you ever had that moment on a dance floor where, mid-boogie, you look around and think, what the hell are we all doing? I had a moment like that when I was thinking about tonight. All these have been designed, printed, bound, cut, driven thousand of kilometres around the country; put online, all for short stories. The Minister is here. There’s one, two, three, ten thousand people…

So since it’s why we’re here, what is a short story?

In 2006 I’d been writing just two years. My family and friends were pushing me to submit my work but I was waiting. Mostly I thought I wasn’t quite good enough yet. But sometimes I wondered if I might just be scared of rejection.

Nevertheless, I was writing story after story as a way of practising. Not caring if they were perfect, caring only that they had a line, a paragraph, an idea in them I could be proud of. And all stories have that.

As a naive writer I wandered round the outside of the Melbourne writing world, wondering how you got in. I found and devoured a Sleepers Almanac, looked at the submission guidelines and sat back at my writing desk, and thought, at last.

It was another year of hard work before I did finally send my first story off, to the New Yorker.

Which is perhaps the first thing a short story is, it’s ambitious. Getting a narrative off the ground, up to cruising altitude, and safely back down again on such a short airfield is Top Gun hard. Short stories are the wafer thin Swiss watch of the writing world. All the mechanisms of a novel but in a triumphantly elegant package.

Not just ambitious, a short story is also hopeful. If you’re doing it right, you’re taking a truth of your own, turning it into characters, putting those characters in a plot unlike your own, but trying to have it all still resonate the bit of you that sat down to write in the first place. A bit like redecorating your front hallway through your letterbox, that.

Which must make a short story a marker of perseverance, or perversity. So important to you is that truth that you resist all the easy distractions of modern living. You work at this literary contortion act alone. You send it out along with all those other competing truths in the world, foolish or courageous enough to ask an editor-stranger if, out of all the others, they could please love it too.

And who could possibly love your story like you love it. Blind to its frailties. Loving it the way your gran wants you to love her incontinent poodle; like your dad loves his crusty towelling dressing gown; like your brother’s guitar playing or your girlfriend’s parallel parking.

And so in that way, a short story is a bridge – between the disguised innards of its author to the innards of a reader. Because if you get it right, and we only manage that from time to time, you get to plant your insides in another person. So much so that they recognise your truth as their own.

I had a woman tell me on election night that she plans to have a line from my novel tattooed on her body.

But short stories are mostly unrequited, foolish, devil-may-care. Because you can’t be sure if they will be accepted, often they’re not. They get sent back to you with scabby knees and grazed elbows.

Or if accepted, readers flick over them. They miss your truth – mangle your plot. You had a story in the last Almanac didn’t you? they say at a party. It was about talking dogs, wasn’t it? Sleeping horses, actually. Yeah, I read half that one.

After the New Yorker rejected me, the Almanac was next. Mainly because since attending one of their launches and looking at their submission guidelines it became clear to me that what I would be submitting to was a fresh-faced meritocracy.

What can be more important to our writing ecosystem than something which says to a burgeoning writer, there is nothing stopping you being published but what happens between you and your writing. Not your name. Not your CV. Not your reputation. A proper publisher which says if you write a great story, we’ll publish it. Actually, we’ll champion it. All a writer need do then is practice. And god knows you need that struggle to be all there is, because that struggle is struggley enough as it is.

Without the sense that merit alone is enough, a writer looking to climb the ladder will see only one rung, the top one. Who would begin climbing?

I wouldn’t be writing now if it weren’t for strategic encouragement when I was beginning, and I wouldn’t be writing now if I didn’t have a faith in writing that is sometimes just as blind as Grandma’s love for her poodle – if I too didn’t mind that while licking my face, my story’s tongue might stray into my mouth.

And I might not be writing now if there weren’t an Almanac – a precious combination of reputable and fair.

I got my first ever acceptance email whilst on holiday in Turkey. Me and my then girlfriend were travelling the awful Black Sea coast – her driving was driving me up the wall; people on the filthy beaches would finish their drink or cigarettes and throw them in the sea; at the day’s end we’d try to find an unsqualid place to camp, and howling wolves would wake us terrified in the night.

But for three weeks after that email telling me Sleepers had accepted my story, I was transcendentally happy. The Black Sea coast became an eccentric heaven. We weren’t down and out, we were free. And was it me, or had her driving improved?!

And so the definition of a short story is not a short story. They’re an opportunity to practice quickly a craft that takes years – a lifetime – to never quite perfect. They’re an opportunity to let out that which brims painfully or deliciously full inside you. But, more than that, if you’re in here, it means you managed to really capture that feeling, that brimming. Here it is translated into print, where this physical artefact of your uncertain toil makes a very certain sound indeed.

But more amazing still, it means that what sat you down to write and rewrite will make its way into others. In the comfort of their own anywhere, people will be able to pat your inner poodle.

And so on a night like tonight a short story is a community. A celebration. No wonder there’s ten thousand of us gathered. I salute all the writers in this edition; all those who’ve been published here before; but most of all, those of you who will be one day. In whatever form.

As for Sleepers. Amazing design. An amazing eye. PASSION. Pioneer spirit. The decency to be decent in the way you carry yourselves and your trade. The guts to run a meritocracy even though a more cynical approach could sell you more copies. The courage to choose this over a safer career.

Sleepers is already a benchmark in this country, I recognised that years ago. I also recognise that this wonderful rung on a difficult ladder is rising fast, but not losing its values along the way. It’s taking Australian literature up with it.

You make it seem possible. You make it seem worthwhile. You make it feel amazing. For that, every aspiring writer should thank you. And so will every reader.

The Danger Game by Kalinda Ashton

tdgSleepers Publishing
August 2009, Australia
9781740668132

Three children – one insular, one bold, and one stubborn and growing – dare each other to undertake dangerous or humiliating tasks in the ‘danger game’. Their lives are daring enough, with an unstable father and a mother on-edge, and mature secrets inside each of their little heads.

Only two of them live in the present – sisters in different cities who in the course of this narrative band together again and take on new challenges. Louise, the bold one, wants to find her mother. Alice is older, in admiration of her sister despite the needle-marks and fantastical lies that spout from her mouth. Alice gets caught up in relationships and politics, but it isn’t until her sister arrives that she really acts. Louise comes to Melbourne with the idea of not only finding their long-estranged mother, but finding out what really happened the day her twin, Jeremy, died. Alice has plenty on her plate already, with the school she teaches at under threat of closure. But their efforts become harmonious – their struggles rendered in some of the most shockingly brilliant prose I’ve read.

As the present events unfold – searching but stubborn Alice in first person; and the magic, clever, simultaneously vulnerable and resilient Louise in second person – the reader is also made privy to the events of that day, unfolding in the past, with Jeremy – the lost. As such, Jeremy becomes like a ghost upon the present. And finding out what really happened is just one of the narrative drives (along with what will happen with Alice’s school and relationship situation, and whether Louise will find her mother and stay away from drugs). Having Jeremy’s chapters throughout the book also acts to show the continuing impact of the death of a family member - especially one so young, unformed and unknown – on the present.

The father is a sad and ambiguous character, mentally ill, and still present in the girls’ lives. There are other secondary characters. Alice’s married lover Jon (someone she clings to though she herself is not even sure why); some of her students; and Alice’s best friend Sarah – whose purpose I didn’t first understand, but came to as the narrative moved along.

Ordinary life is richly rendered in this very contemporary novel, which is not only enjoyable, and literary, but political too, at its heart. Alice’s struggles – trying to keep the school open, alongside other struggles in the book – are about fairness, strength and daring. Realistically, the quiet and alone and hard-done-by characters don’t always come out on top, such as young Jeremy. Layered within the themes, descriptions and dialogue, too, are references to confusion and alienation, consumerism, youthful dissatisfaction, drug use and other modern societal issues. I can’t emphasise enough, though, how fulfilling the writing itself is, so that while a chord is being struck deep and low, your imagination is ensconced in the characters and their rooms, cafes, schools, backyards, city streets; and deep within their vivid, colourful and sense-filled childhood.

Another of the themes is imagination and escape, not just for children with a difficult home and school life, but escape in an adult present, both physical and mental. And the effect of great escapes (such as their mother’s physical one, or their father’s – into the bottle) on generation next. Louise’s drugs and Alice’s sex are other complex explorations of that fine line between retreat and daring. When does it hurt others? When is that actually inevitable? When is it okay to escape and when is it time to stand up?

The dialogue flows very naturally, but there were times (and this is my only, tiny qualm) where every character was very open and said what they meant. Occasionally this crossed into unbelieving territory for me. I wish that people spoke like that. And people like Alice and Louise might do… but at points, every character states their thoughts a little too defiantly.

Ashton shows us a difficult world, an unfair and confronting and complicated world, where comfort and pieces of happiness come out of living right on that edge of brave and daring. And she writes lively, originally, masterfully, unexpectedly. I was completely absorbed.

Things We Didn’t See Coming by Steven Amsterdam

twdsccvrSleepers Publishing, 9781740667012, 2009 (Aus, US)

Things We Didn’t See Coming is a series of vignettes, from different stages of the unnamed protagonist’s life in a dystopian alterno-present/future. It is a post-apocalyptic story, but told in a hard-boiled, yet highly resonant literary style. The sentences are sharp, the character is hard and the environment is one of rapid change and ruin – but throughout there is also deep resistance. The book acts to massage you at your core, and every secondary character met along the way (no matter how fleeting) leaves a poignant stain on character and reader. They are examples from all of humanity’s shredded social standings – how different people would deal with natural disasters, segregation (between urban and land environments), political situations (and radical politics), survival against disease, and more. There is so much imagination at work in describing employment the character undertakes throughout the novel, and in his family situation, his love life, and his drive for physical and emotional survival. Though it is a series of stories, they run linear – from a small boy taken to his grandparents house on the eve of Y2K (which isn’t named, but that’s what the situation seems to be) and his father’s rant about the world we live in, to a conclusion which shows that through all the rapid fluctuations in the world, some people don’t change, and there will always be pockets of good, of nature, of things that don’t make sense at the time. There will always be meaning to a fleeting existence.

The character is adamantly nonreligious, but there really is a spiritual essence in this book – in his personal ethical struggles, and the overriding hope within the bleakness. The character fights with his instinctual nature to steal, and to live for survival and himself alone. This is a great part of his journey that isn’t played out overtly, but is present in his actions throughout the novel.

There are many moments of struggle and sadness, such as the chapter ‘The Theft That Got Me Here’, an incredibly poignant escape with his grandparents, on the day his grandmother’s pills kick in and she becomes herself again, fleetingly.

There are also moments of pure imaginative fun – sexual encounters; a difficult and moving love story; a cocky kid the protagonist has to guard; the jobs; the conflict; and the pharmacopia.

One interesting thing to note – the setting of the book is unknown and never made explicit. Deer are mentioned, and some landscapes that seem North American, so it will also sell in that market, I presume, but my imagination still planted the story in Australia. I know it’s due to my awareness of the author’s origination, but I think one of the points of it is it could be imagined in just about any Western country. A kind of nowhere-land of modern Western civilisation and societal mores, politics, religions, etc.

Another experience of reading this book, is the realisation that so much of it actually seems plausible. It is rooted in a speculative framework, but it is very near-future, or even alternate future. Droughts and floods, for example, don’t seem so implausible – and the political situations that may arise due to technological class divisions, generation gaps and opposing urban/nature mindsets. Not to mention evolving illnesses and an ever-increasing cocktail of drugs. Of course while much of it is imaginable, much of it is highly fantastical, and both prove the quality of Amsterdam’s skill and imagination.

Things We Didn’t See Coming is bleak yet inspiring, a little like retro-future text Blade Runner. It’s a completely refreshing literary work from an Australian writer who I predict huge things for.

See the official website for the book.